I rarely use my blog to forward links to articles, but this one from
the Harvard Business Review strikes me as very important. (Unfortunately,
it does a better job of pinpointing the seriousness of the problem than it does
resolving it.)
The writer
diagnoses two ways in which email is harming productivity—and, much more important, harming us.
First, this incessant communication fragments attention, leaving only
small stretches left in which to attempt to think deeply, apply your skills at
a high level, or otherwise perform well the core activity of knowledge work:
extracting value from information. To make matters worse, cognitive performance
during these stretches is further reduced by the “attention residue” left from the frequent
context switching required to “just check” if something important arrived.
The second harm is more personal. As more knowledge workers now
acknowledge, the inbox-bound lifestyle created by an unstructured workflow is
exhausting and anxiety-provoking. Humans are not wired to exist in a constant
state of divided attention, and we need the ability to gain distance from work
to reflect and recharge. Put simply, this workflow, which can transform even
the highest skilled knowledge workers into message-passing automatons, is
making an entire sector of our economy miserable.
The drastic
solution he proposes—replacing email with other systems for workplace
communication—is beyond what I could implement as a pastor or even at the
Archdiocese. In fact, another
HBR article argues against such extreme measures.
But I know
I have to do something, since there’s no doubt in my case that the daily
torrent of emails is “exhausting and anxiety-provoking” and that their
portability gravely impairs my ability to reflect and recharge, as the first
article suggests.
No comments:
Post a Comment