I
often talk with the music teacher at St. Anthony’s School about getting me a
role in a school play. Ever since I
played St. Joseph in the Christmas pageant—costumed in a cozy bathrobe that I
still wear—I’ve been hoping for another chance to get on stage.
What
I really hope is that the school will perform the musical Oliver!, because I’m
dying to appear in this adaptation of the Charles Dickens novel Oliver Twist. As a youngster I
auditioned for the role of Oliver, but the director quickly decided I looked
too well-fed for the role. But in high school, I played the lovable villain Fagin
with considerable success, if I do say so myself.
However,
there’s no chance of my dream coming true until the copyright owners re-write
the play, because the story ends with the violent murder of the heroine,
Nancy. And we can’t have the children
watching that.
At
least that’s the way modern thinking goes. As kids we read Grimm’s Fairy Tales—and
they were certainly grim. We heard a witch threaten to eat Hansel and Gretel, a
wolf threaten to eat Little Red Riding Hood, and a king threaten to cut off a
girl’s head if she won’t marry the goblin Rumpelstiltskin—but somehow we
survived.
Children
have a way of filtering out the scary bits of familiar stories.
But
today I wonder whether adults do that, too—and whether it’s a good thing when
it comes to the Word of God.
I
watch the faces of the congregation whenever I read the story of Abraham and
Isaac, and no one ever looks shocked or appalled. Yet find me a tenser moment
in the whole Old Testament than when Abraham takes up the knife. If we really
listened, we’d gasp in horror.
The
second reading today helps us stop and think about the meaning of the first
reading—about how Abraham’s sacrifice connects to the sacrifice of Jesus on the
cross. Not only that: it helps us understand how the enormity, the awfulness,
of Calvary should affect each of us in a personal way.
After
hearing the story of Abraham and Isaac, we haven’t a shred of doubt that
Abraham loved God more than anything in the world, even his son. We understand
why he is called our father in faith, and how he is a model of obedience for
all time.
But
St. Paul tells us that the Crucifixion should convince us that God loved us
with an incomparable love, and that this love is still being poured out on us
and for us. Paul’s question says it all “He who did not withhold his own Son,
but gave him up for all of us, will he not with him also give us everything
else?”
The
translation is a bit difficult. Listen to the more flowing words in the
Jerusalem Bible: “Since God did not spare his own Son, but gave him up to
benefit us all, we may be certain, after such a gift, that he will not refuse
anything he can give.”
From
my bedroom window in the seminary in Rome, I could see the front of St. Paul’s
Basilica. At the very top of the church is a cross and the words “Spes unica”—the
cross our “only hope.”
To be a Christ-follower means wrestling with the mystery of the cross. For some, as St. Paul says, the cross is a scandal, an obstacle; it’s as if Abraham had killed Isaac. How would we like hearing the story if that was its unhappy ending?
To be a Christ-follower means wrestling with the mystery of the cross. For some, as St. Paul says, the cross is a scandal, an obstacle; it’s as if Abraham had killed Isaac. How would we like hearing the story if that was its unhappy ending?
The
fine Anglican preacher Fleming Rutledge says that Jesus on the cross, atoning
for our sins with his sacrificial death, will cause offense in every generation.
Some make the mistake of picturing a wrathful God, condemning his innocent,
victimized Son. Rutledge says “This mistake must be strenuously resisted.”
And
so it must, for as she says “At the heart of the mystery of the atoning
sacrifice of the Son of God is the fact that the Father’s will and the Son’s
will are one. This is an action that the Father and the Son are taking
together.” (The Undoing of Death,
122)
And
there is the fundamental difference between the sacrifice on Mount Moriah and
the sacrifice on Calvary, where Christ was both priest and victim.
A
traditional way of looking at our Gospel today is that Jesus let his glory be
seen in order to prepare his disciples for the scandal of the Cross—to give
them a glimpse of his Resurrection so that they would not despair at his death.
For
too many of us, there’s no scandal in the Cross. Like children listening to fairy
tales at bedtime, we’ve heard the story so many times that it fails to engage
the deeper level of our emotion or our intellect. We haven’t thought long and
hard enough about all that the saving sacrifice of Jesus means and all that it
reveals about God’s limitless love.
But
this Sunday the Word of God leads us to an unavoidable conclusion—that there
can be no terror, no condemnation, no ultimate defeat, for those for whom the
Father gave up his Son.
No comments:
Post a Comment